- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 4,938
- Reaction score
- 1,448
god your pathetic low grade 'gotcha' attempt isnt going to work on me, but heres some of your own words. i know you have a hard time being able to read, so i bolded and underlined the words you should be looking at
its not my business what the law defines as a deadly and dangerous weapon. you claim to be a former prosecutor (lol)
youre a big boy so i'm sure you'd have no problem being able to look up on your own what the law defines as a deadly or dangerous weapon, and then take that up with the courts. your argument wont go anywhere with me. i dont have the power to drop the federal charges these 440+ maga muppets have been hit with
it certainly wouldn’t meet the statutory requirements for “firearm” or “deadly weapon” but it would be a jury question as to whether a stun gun is a “dangerous weapon”. I’m sure there’s case law that supports that proposition and some that doesn’t. But ultimately the act of carrying a weapon while committing a non violent act isn’t violent. Not sure what yoir point is bringing up what he’s charged with. I already know.