Oh Care Bare, you are something else.
Nate doesn't have a "snowballs chance in hell" of becoming LW champ? Kinda like Cain vs. Werdum, Ronda vs Holly, and Conor vs Nate were "sure things"?
At this point most of us think you're an odd type of troll, but I'll still humor you with a response here. See, the thing is Barr-o, Nate doesn't NEED to become world champ for this bet to make sense genius. All he needs to to is GET THE TITLE SHOT. And with his recent win over your Conor (and again I'll remind you of your sweet advice to everyone to use Conor in parlays and bet him because he can't lose--every night I include in my bedtime prayers that there aren't actually suckers following your advice btw) Nate has even more name recognition. So basically Nate could be one more win away from a title shot, or even possibly get the next shot it there was an injury or something. Here's a pretty realistic scenario for ya dumbass: Dana gives winner of Khabib/Ferg the shot. Nate rematches Cerrone maybe or takes another fight at LW and wins it. Winner of Ferg/Khabib gets hurt (and if it was to be Khabib odds are pretty good he would get hurt). Nate steps in again as the replacement. Let's say RDA is -450 vs Nate, or -500. Now you have Nate +6600 in this fight already. So what do you think you could do here Barry?
I don't think you have a conscience if you are giving betting advice. You are like the intentional version of William H Macy's character the Cooler in that movie.