Dodson would have won that if he had a fauxhawk, tattoos, and acted like he really wanted to throw down.
Don't bother with that dumb fuck. He is a derp tard and doesn't deserve any more attentionThat's just stupid. He "ran" but landed more and some were clean. Look at Lineker's face for fuck's sake. Moving forward is fine but it's not the only strategy. Rock em sock em robots isn't a requirement. Dodson had a strategy and if you look at the #'s it worked.
I'm not saying Dodson got robbed either. It was 2 different styles. Both guys did their thing, both had their moments, super close fight. To say it was a robbery either way makes zero sense.
liniker dec and split lines saved the night was down 10+u and ended even pretty much
That's just stupid. He "ran" but landed more and some were clean. Look at Lineker's face for fuck's sake. Moving forward is fine but it's not the only strategy. Rock em sock em robots isn't a requirement. Dodson had a strategy and if you look at the #'s it worked.
I'm not saying Dodson got robbed either. It was 2 different styles. Both guys did their thing, both had their moments, super close fight. To say it was a robbery either way makes zero sense.
That's just stupid. He "ran" but landed more and some were clean. Look at Lineker's face for fuck's sake. Moving forward is fine but it's not the only strategy. Rock em sock em robots isn't a requirement. Dodson had a strategy and if you look at the #'s it worked.
I'm not saying Dodson got robbed either. It was 2 different styles. Both guys did their thing, both had their moments, super close fight. To say it was a robbery either way makes zero sense.
I was foolish to doubt you again....i laughed at these props when u guys discussed them....great hits!!!1.5u Lineker DEC +900
0.15u Lineker Split DEC +20xx
Fuck yeah
liniker dec and split lines saved the night was down 10+u and ended even pretty much
Are you implying you think Dodson should have won based on accuracy metrics and its a just bleed mentality that led the judges to score it for Lineker? Or am i way off base.
Jesus Christ, go and watch backyard brawling videos on YouTube because MMA isn't for you.I don't think its that stupid. His face looked that way b/c he had to force the exchanges. Dodson ran the whole fight; Lineker could have accepted that Dodson probably was going to look to counter due to his style and play against that and then it would have just been them looking at each other. It's an entertainment industry, its pretty ridiculous when you train year round and then when your time to fight comes like 2-3x a year you avoid the fight to win on scorecards.
Are you implying you think Dodson should have won based on accuracy metrics and its a just bleed mentality that led the judges to score it for Lineker? Or am i way off base.
Where are u seeing Dodson landed more?
I will play advocate for the other sideThat's just stupid. He "ran" but landed more and some were clean. Look at Lineker's face for fuck's sake. Moving forward is fine but it's not the only strategy. Rock em sock em robots isn't a requirement. Dodson had a strategy and if you look at the #'s it worked.
I'm not saying Dodson got robbed either. It was 2 different styles. Both guys did their thing, both had their moments, super close fight. To say it was a robbery either way makes zero sense.
Combat sports wouldn't exist at this level unless they get paid. They won't get paid unless it contributes to being an entertainment industry. Whether or not its the best strategy, they chose to get into this field to fight professionally on a nationally televised sport. It won't succeed if success is dictated by winning rounds on points. Half the roster trains year round to claim this as their income and when the time comes to apply their trade they do everything but avoid the ultimate conflict they intended to enter into the first place. Whatever, agree to disagree.Jesus Christ, go and watch backyard brawling videos on YouTube because MMA isn't for you.