- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 27,351
- Reaction score
- 3,423
No, they didn't confirm, they claimed. Tony Bobulinski, who Tucker invited on his show, and who was Donald Trump's guest for the debates, and who gave that embarrassing press conference, and has since faded into Bolivia (as Mike Tyson would say). You claim this hasn't been investigated, but it has.
Check it:
1. The Washington Post verified a portion of Hunter's emails, that they were legit.
2. The New York Times verified a portion of Hunter's emails as well.
3. The Washington Post matched financial records found on the hard drive to information found in other records, showing they are legit.
4. CBS News did similar work. All used several forensic analysts. This was REALLY looked into.
The “10 held by H for the big guy?” refers to this:
1. Hunter Biden was one of 5 partners working on a deal with CEFC, a Chinese Energy company.
2. His uncle Jim Biden was another of the partners.
3. The 5 partners were planning on creating a business entity called Oneida Holdings LLC, for their venture with CEFC.
4. James Gilliar was a business associate summarizing the ownership stake the 5 partners would take in Oneida. In an email he wrote how four partners would get 20 percent each, except for Jim Biden, who would get 10 percent.
5. He then added this question: “10 held by H for the big guy?”
6. Tony Bobulinski, one of the recipients of the email, says the big guy is Joe Biden, when nothing indicates it is Joe Biden.
7. Gilliar himself, who actually wrote the fucking email, said it wasn't about Joe Biden.
8. A few days after the email was sent, we have evidence of draft agreement between the partners. It shows all 5 partners, including Jim Biden, ended up receiving 20% Oneida Ownership.
9. The Washington Post and Wall Street Journal both reviewed corporate records and found no evidence of involvement from Joe Biden.
So what are we supposed to do with this? What's actionable here against Joe Biden? Where's the big crime? If you want to follow a conspiracy, maybe look into who might be paying Tony Bobulinski, who is so desperate for money he's had to resort to some truly awful shit to try to make money; for example, he sued his own father, who was dying of cancer, and father's children's charity. He claimed, without evidence, that they defrauded him of $25,000. So he sued them for $900,000. It didn't work.
So 4 partners were getting 20, Jim was getting 10, but H was also holding 10 for the big guy?
Do you even read that before you wrote it?