- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 0
Nobody is going to follow you because you aren't making any sense. Plekz is the guy coming at you with a sledgehammer, and honestly so far from what you've posted you pretty much deserve it. I'm going to take the more subtle approach in an attempt to allow you to somehow explain what you've posted so far. Because honestly saying "the error estimating this probability" is complete and utter garbage.
YOU are the ones "estimating this probability". Your service, your "system", whatever. You can't on one hand tell us what your system believes the odds of fighter x winning and then turn around and say "But we are going to make a recommendation that completely disregards our probability because of (insert whatever silly word you want--variance, margin of error, whatever)". Why even calculate what you think the odds of fighter x winning are if you aren't then going to take that info, compare it to the current betting line, and place your wagers accordingly? You keep saying it's "not that simple". But in reality, it IS that simple.
Real talk: You are doing exactly what Plekz said you are doing. Hoping to have a good event and gain a couple subscribers. You'd have been better off just posting "Here, bet on these 5 guys" with no explanation at all. Instead you've posted a a bunch of nonsense. No offense, but you aren't the smartest guy in the room and we all just don't get it. I know English isn't your first language, but you completely botched this buddy. Nobody is going to pay you a dime from this site even if you get lucky and have a great event. The lack of any type of actual logic in making your picks has pretty much ensured that. Sorry man.
@mkess101 it is just fine that you express your opinion. What I don't get is why you all get so mad in the first place. None is forced to follow us, we are just showing our tips and tomorrow our results. We are committed to show them over a long period of time and we will let people make their minds looking at the results and not the chat.