- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 51,934
- Reaction score
- 25,645
You know who needed help? The elderly being introduced to the COVID patients deliberately.You people need help.
You know who needed help? The elderly being introduced to the COVID patients deliberately.You people need help.
That makes more sense than housing people with a virus we know little about, with the exception that it's unbelievably contagious, with the most fragile people on society. People who could very well die from the common cold or flu.You people need help.
Please explain the rationalization for putting the Covid infected in nursing homes
You don’t realize how freaked out the establishment was by not having one of “their picks” in office. They have bought and paid for the power over us, and they are deathly afraid of losing all that power.
That makes more sense than housing people with a virus we know little about, with the exception that it's unbelievably contagious, with the most fragile people on society. People who could very well die from the common cold or flu.
It's such an unbelievably idiotic move that people will speculate.
The real reason is irrelevant. He's guilty of criminal negligence or of being criminally stupid at least. Is that more palatable?
I'm more willing to believe people in positions of higher power are sociopaths or psychopaths personally. Those positions attract that type of personality after all. Idiots don't tend to find success in any part of life without help either.I believe these people are that stupid. Some egomaniac thought he knew better than everyone else, or just hastily made a decision without giving much thought of the consequences--especially in the middle of a global pandemic where a billion things were going on at one time, yeah, I can believe a lot of careless shit went on.
That's a lot more plausible to me than he's a psychopath that intentionally killed old people.
I'm not saying this to defend him. So it isn't about what's more palatable.
But someone being grossly negligent and stupid, vs. someone being a sociopathic murderer are worlds apart. It does matter when it comes to how we talk about these things.
I'm more willing to believe people in positions of higher power are sociopaths or psychopaths personally. Those positions attract that type of personality after all. Idiots don't tend to find success in any part of life without help either.
What you're saying is us simpletons in the War Room were better informed than those in power. And if that's the case then that scenario is at least as unacceptable as strategically killing off old folks. Why? Because these fucks calling the shots are supposed to be the exceptional ones amongst us. They're supposed to know better than a bunch of schmucks on a karate board.
They're supposed to make the right calls. If they're to be granted special powers and privileges then they should be subject to special punishment. Cuomo should find himself in front of a firing squad, not receive a pension. Regardless of why he killed off those old people. The end result is more important than the reasoning behind it to me.
Sociopaths it is!When I say they're stupid, I don't mean they are stupid in the traditional sense of how we usually think of that word. Most of them went to top tier, Ivy league schools. But an Ivy league education can't buy you common sense, or help you to connect with people. These people are disconnected, and socially really stupid. They are driven more by ego and winning this political game. And when you're driven by ego, or what you think voters, or donors are going to think, you tend to make stupid decisions that are not based on facts.
I get your viewpoint about people in power. It's understandable. I just think these people have no common sense because they don't interact with common people.
Because of how our system is structured, people get in power in politics not from being the most clever, or cutt throat,, you just have to kiss the right ass, know the right people, go to the right school, and keep oiling the machine...and eventually, you'll get your shot. They're just trying to keep this cool kid's club going. I don't think there is a lot of thought that goes into this, it's just about keeping the game going.
I don't disagree with a lot of what you're saying. But we schmucks voted those schmucks in. For me, the reasons why people do things is the most important part because that tells us how to fix the problem. Regardless of the reason, the blame is on him, but to go beyond whose ass to kick, I need to know why it happened.
I get the pragmatism in that. And there are definitely cases where I too would only care about the end result..those cases are usually when money is on the line.Sociopaths it is!
Yeah I've had the same criticism of both our TDS inducing leaders the past few years. Those morons don't live in the world they were chosen to rule over. We're heading towards Idiocracy at full speed and most don't realize it because we've been distracted by being encouraged to squabble amongst ourselves.
If I hire an outfit to do a job for me I legit don't care why they fucked it up, but am more concerned about the shit end product. I'll also evaluate why I made a bad choice and definitely won't use that same company again. Yet many people would have voted for this murder again. And that's insanity in action.
It SHOULD be the same with politicians, but unfortunately we cant pull them into the office to fire them when theyve done shit jobs, so the end result doesnt matter as much to me when I cant hold them accountable in real time.
.
And why not? They used to resign regularly in light of scandals and screw ups. Somehow we've allowed ourselves to be brainwashed into thinking they should be exempt from rules the rest of us live by. Just look at our idiot in charge up here. Trudeau has a list of ethics violations longer than anyone else in memory but your way of thinking has his supporters giving him a pass.
I understand the value of stability, but accountability standards must be upheld or else people will slide into unacceptable behavior via complacency. That's just human nature.
Theres 2 key takeaways from this
#1. Biden is a lot more powerful and influential than Bunker Boy.
Bunker Boy called for Cuomo's resignation multiple times as POTUS, nobody listened. BIden calls for his resignation, Cuomo listens.
#2. As Biden said, personal conduct aside, Cuomo did a hell of a job as a Governor, leading Covid down after the first wave, key influencer in the infrastructure package, popularized masking, etc.
Lol. The difference is one went on the record in front of congress under penalty of perjury and the other said something to reporters.