- Joined
- Feb 12, 2004
- Messages
- 144,295
- Reaction score
- 104,137
Something about being an animorph and turning into an orca.
I expect he has already figured out how to do this,and just wont say how.
Basically he's GSP so he can.
Something about being an animorph and turning into an orca.
Both you guys got way outside of the GSP religious topic. I like it though. Thanks for the insight.Mate, there's no evidence they use c-14 dating for dinosaurs. It's pointless to use something that can only go back 50,000 years or so. Maybe they use it for fossils that they seem younger than 50,0000 years.
For something millions of years old, they use isotopic. It has a longer shelf. The isotopic dating they found in early moon rocks is consistent with the age of the earth and the moon. It's pretty reliable man. Never say never but I don't see you provided any evidence that radiometric dating is incorrect. Only that radiocarbon Data is incorrect and an article dealing with biblical artifacts. Not dinosaur bones. Biblical artifacts would be something they would use with carbon dating. It's fine there. Even with it's issues. It's not as accurate as a DNA test but it's not way off base either.
Lots of ancient civilizations describe dinosaur/dragon like creatures so I am open to the possibility that dinosaurs or a surviving species of dinosaurs may have survived and were living around humans. If crocodiles/alligators were able to
I find it incredibly hard to believe humans existed in the same time dinosaurs existed and it seems fanciful to try to tie humans and dinosaurs timelines together and use incredulity and uncertainty about the dating methods to bring an hypothesis they might have existedI thought GSP was a little out there, but we got someone here saying humans rode on the backs of brontosauruses!
Maybe in the religions practiced by dinosaurs it instructs them to bury their dead under many layers of rock.Instead humans are found six feet under relatively speaking and dinosaurs are found layers and layers below with a different diet of food if they found evidence of what they ate.
<Lmaoo>Maybe in the religions practiced by dinosaurs it instructs them to bury their dead under many layers of rock.
Different species, hard to judge.
He's got ya there pal.<Lmaoo>
I'm not going to spend too much time researching this topic to find data to post here. It's late and they don't test actual dinosaur bones. They test sediments/fossils/rocks around the dinosaur bones. That's where lots of inaccuracies can happen. There are many ways the testing can be off, and a lot of factors can contribute to wrong readings. That's why it's not 100% accurate, they have an estimate that may be incorrect. They give you a range of a certain million years. It could be anywhere within 10-30 million years in their estimates. That's far from being accurate especially since they aren't not testing the actual bones and just rocks around it. You can't have results that inaccurate or with so much room for error and expect me to just accept it as fact. Either you are 100% sure and can prove it, if it isn't 100% accurate that opens up the other theories. Because they are all theories anyway. I personally don't think it's as old as their testing would like you to believe and I believe there were dinosaurs around with humans. Ancient civilizations describing dinosaurs/dragons is one of the reasons I'm open to the theory of it. I mean if alligators/crocodiles/turtles/sharks etc were all able to survive why not others? They may have survived and were around humans and they didn't just wander the earth by themselves for millions of years before humans. I believe most got wiped out but a few may have survived. Chickens and birds have the closest DNA to dinosaurs and they are still around.Mate, there's no evidence they use c-14 dating for dinosaurs. It's pointless to use something that can only go back 50,000 years or so. Maybe they use it for fossils that they seem younger than 50,0000 years.
For something millions of years old, they use isotopic. It has a longer shelf. The isotopic dating they found in early moon rocks is consistent with the age of the earth and the moon. It's pretty reliable man. Never say never but I don't see you provided any evidence that radiometric dating is incorrect. Only that radiocarbon Data is incorrect and an article dealing with biblical artifacts. Not dinosaur bones. Biblical artifacts would be something they would use with carbon dating. It's fine there. Even with it's issues. It's not as accurate as a DNA test but it's not way off base either.
It's been shown when I was in class. Same with Harry Potter..those movies always put me to sleep. Princess bride, that was my shit back in the day. Jurassic Park, harry potter, Lord of the rings. Boring ass movies that put me to sleep fast . I got into evolution when I became an atheist which got me into study of dinosaur and bones.Also id like to know why @Peli has all this interest in dinosaurs and has NEVER seen Jurassic Park. I cant trust a man who hasnt seen that movie. Where the fuck you been? Jail?
10-30million years is acceptable to me. It's within the same realm for long range testing. In human years, that's a long time but the scope of civilations, that's not a long time frame.I'm not going to spend too much time researching this topic to find data to post here. It's late and they don't test actual dinosaur bones. They test sediments/fossils/rocks around the dinosaur bones. That's where lots of inaccuracies can happen. There are many ways the testing can be off, and a lot of factors can contribute to wrong readings. That's why it's not 100% accurate, they have an estimate that may be incorrect. They give you a range of a certain million years. It could be anywhere within 10-30 million years in their estimates. That's far from being accurate especially since they aren't not testing the actual bones and just rocks around it. You can't have results that inaccurate or with so much room for error and expect me to just accept it as fact. Either you are 100% sure and can prove it, if it isn't 100% accurate that opens up the other theories. Because they are all theories anyway. I personally don't think it's as old as their testing would like you to believe and I believe there were dinosaurs around with humans. Ancient civilizations describing dinosaurs/dragons is one of the reasons I'm open to the theory of it. I mean if alligators/crocodiles/turtles/sharks etc were all able to survive why not others? They may have survived and were around humans and they didn't just wander the earth by themselves for millions of years before humans. I believe most got wiped out but a few may have survived. Chickens and birds have the closest DNA to dinosaurs and they are still around.
There's nothin fuckin boring about it. Its got dinosaurs fuckin eating people. Whatsamatta you?!?!It's been shown when I was in class. Same with Harry Potter..those movies always put me to sleep. Princess bride, that was my shit back in the day. Jurassic Park, harry potter, Lord of the rings. Boring ass movies that put me to sleep fast . I got into evolution when I became an atheist which got me into study of dinosaur and bones.
.
What's GSP's opinion on religion, philosophy, aliens, reality and all that good stuff?
Can anyone pour forth an extremely detailed answer to this? The more detail the better.
Boring ass movies. Couldn't stand them in high school. I wouldn't even watch them for a grade or I'd write down the 20 facts then go to sleep. Boring ass shitsThere's nothin fuckin boring about it. Its got dinosaurs fuckin eating people. Whatsamatta you?!?!
Boring ass movies. Couldn't stand them in high school. I wouldn't even watch them for a grade or I'd write down the 20 facts then go to sleep. Boring ass shits