- Joined
- Jun 19, 2015
- Messages
- 20,349
- Reaction score
- 20,778
Thats quite the stretch considering teachers and the like will g a child but wait until they are 18. Like pat berry and rose namajunas. That doesn't make him a pedo it makes him a groomer.
But when you need to censor one side in a pinch changing definitions is the go to for the left these days so i can see why the site would skew the definition. Gross.
Like i said before the problem with discussing the topic is we end up having direct accusations towards others. An easy example is Joe Biden, the dude 100% has a creepiness about him. There just isnt any direct evidence that he is one. So the problem comes up when the accusations start flowing. Having the conversation in of itself isnt the issue. Like when discussing how the Catholic church helped hide child predators has been allowed on here.
The topic itself isnt directly banned, but the user base cant stay within the rules. The topics start getting dominated by the accusations, so to help keep from having to hand out card or bans, the threads end up getting locked. Then the administration team starts getting accused of defending pedos/groomers. Its a vicious circle where i can understand it feeling like the topic itself is completely banned, but that is not the intentions here. The accusations without hard evidence are banned. Preferably we just avoid the topic because it leads to major problems for us modding the topic, and the user base then feels targeted.