Social Boston cancels advanced classes (be less white, and Asian while you're at it)

Everyone huh? Statistically fact?

So that being said, now imagine other things you don't know.

It's common knowledge the Chinese invented gunpowder. Who EVER claims gunpowder came from anywhere other than China? It's one of the 'Four Great Inventions'.
 
Boxing, the klitchkos dominated for a decade. Isn't the current HW champ white? Today it's a dead'ish sport. Nowadays mma has taken its place and it's pretty diverse.

baseball? I thought we were talking about athletes...

football is fairly diverse with certain races tending to excel at things they are naturally gifted at (white lineman with strength, blacks in speed positions)


There is no doubt that certain races excel at certain things. Strongmen are generally white, runners black. However most sports require multiple talents, which is where practice comes in.




White and especially Asian parents are concerned with academics first. More and more whites are pulling away from physical sports because their parents are pussies and can't stand the idea of Timmy getting hurt.

Klitschko only dominates because blacks at HW began going to professional sports that paid more..

Boxing as a whole have way more minorities dominating an that's just a fact.

You can't use the education excuse because white were all in boxing before any other race. They got weeded out as time went by.

I already said in other post that different groups have advantages in certain sports.. but we know who overall is the more athletic group when it comes to sample size.

Blacks are a way smaller percentage of population but are at the top of most profession sports in America. That's a statistical fact that cant be debated.
 
It's common knowledge the Chinese invented gunpowder. Who EVER claims gunpowder came from anywhere other than China? It's one of the 'Four Great Inventions'.

Some people on here we're acting like eastern blocks were the only advance people when obviously that wasn't true.
 
quick question do american schools have say maths one, two and three. is that not going to segregate the classrooms ????

i think your wrong, the nerds are not of any benefit to the less academically minded.

I'm Canadian, but yes, we do have streamed courses. Just not like we used to. In my province, we used to start streaming high school course (1 level, 2 level, 3 level) in 10th grade. We now start in 11th grade. Likewise, trades programs used to start when you entered high school (you would go to a trades school in 10th grade if that was the direction you were headed). Now if you're lucky you go to a school that allows you to pick up a few trades courses in 11th and 12th grade.

As for the "nerds," I'm not sure you read to the end of my post (wouldn't blame you if you didn't; it's a long one), but I mostly agree with you. That said, a class with kids from mixed ability and interest levels does come with some benefits for kids who struggle but really would like to advance in that it gives them some models to follow, and it also reduces the ratio of distracted and distracting students in the room. (Of course, it does the opposite for the "nerds" in that it puts them in a room with more students who are distracted and distracting, but like I said, no one really cares about them).
 
Sure it is. I said every human on different continent have contributed to the world in some way.

The fight over which "races" have contributed to the advancement of society is silly to the max. We stand on the shoulders of giants. All of us.

For me to claim Galileo because he was Italian is the epitome of stupidity and misplaced pride.

If it was up to you and me and people like us we'd all be living in caves and digging for grubs. A very infinitesimal number of humans have come up with things that have propelled us forward as a species. Those people and their legacies belong to the human race. All of us.
 
Klitschko only dominates because blacks at HW began going to professional sports that paid more..

Boxing as a whole have way more minorities dominating an that's just a fact.

You can't use the education excuse because white were all in boxing before any other race. They got weeded out as time went by.

I already said in other post that different groups have advantages in certain sports.. but we know who overall is the more athletic group when it comes to sample size.

Blacks are a way smaller percentage of population but are at the top of most profession sports in America. That's a statistical fact that cant be debated.

So boxing doesn't count because excuses.


Remind us about education when whites dominated boxing, oh yeah, it was terrible.


I would argue the "more athletics" argument.

Perhaps popular sports, basketball (far more popular in the black community), and speed positions in football.

But sports in general? Wrestling? Soccer? Y'all know who rules the water polo scene.


<BC1>
 
Not sure if serious.

Absolutely serious. Look at virtually every great black athlete - slave descent.

That's probably because in Africa that actually have more important things to concentrate than playing sports all day...

Wouldn't that also be true for blacks in the Americas? Boxing for example has always been a poor man's sport, and it doesn't get much poorer than sub-Saharan Africa. So why don't we see the same type of boxing talent from sub-Saharan Africa as the black talent we see of slave descent in the Americas?

You see people like Francis in mma and really believe that's their not thousands of athletes like him in Africa.. I mean he said himself there's alot of them there.

Piss-weak argument. Ngnanou isn't great. He's average with massive power, and was utterly exposed by Miocic after KOing a string of fighters. You're just proving my point. We're talking about great like Roy Jones Jr, Ali, Mayweather etc etc. When has sub-Saharan Africa EVER produced such an athlete? Like I said - boxing has ALWAYS been a poor man's sport. That's why it was so popular amongst immigrant groups in the USA in the early-mid 20th century - Irish, Italian, Jewish, Polish etc etc.

Now to you slave theory. Do you know how long it takes for genetics to change or evolve through animals and humans? I can tell you it takes more that a few hundred years.

It's not "my" slave theory. It's been observed by lots of people and it has nothing to do with evolution. What on earth do animals have to do with this? Crossing the Atlantic on those slave ships was hell and only the fittest survived. Then, the work the slaves had to do was brutal and so many died because of it. Again, only the fittest survived. Then on top of all that, blacks have a good chunk of European ancestry (and some Native American) and the more genetically diverse a person is, they tend to possess greater athleticism.

You don't know what your talking about lol.

Oh, I do. I absolutely do. And you know that, too. That's why your counter-arguments are so weak. lol
 
I guess Elon musk and others who came from Africa m and nothing huh? The entire Continent doesn't have modern technology right? There are poor parts of Africa just like wealthy parts.

Same as here in America. I'm sure you can go down south and see the same disadvantages. Smh

Maybe this jumble of bullshit made sense to you and was relevant to my post, but it made no sense to anyone else.

Can you name some great black philosophers?
 
Absolutely serious. Look at virtually every great black athlete - slave descent.



Wouldn't that also be true for blacks in the Americas? Boxing for example has always been a poor man's sport, and it doesn't get much poorer than sub-Saharan Africa. So why don't we see the same type of boxing talent from sub-Saharan Africa as the black talent we see of slave descent in the Americas?



Piss-weak argument. Ngnanou isn't great. He's average with massive power, and was utterly exposed by Miocic after KOing a string of fighters. You're just proving my point. We're talking about great like Roy Jones Jr, Ali, Mayweather etc etc. When has sub-Saharan Africa EVER produced such an athlete? Like I said - boxing has ALWAYS been a poor man's sport. That's why it was so popular amongst immigrant groups in the USA in the early-mid 20th century - Irish, Italian, Jewish, Polish etc etc.



It's not "my" slave theory. It's been observed by lots of people and it has nothing to do with evolution. What on earth do animals have to do with this? Crossing the Atlantic on those slave ships was hell and only the fittest survived. Then, the work the slaves had to do was brutal and so many died because of it. Again, only the fittest survived. Then on top of all that, blacks have a good chunk of European ancestry (and some Native American) and the more genetically diverse a person is, they tend to possess greater athleticism.



Oh, I do. I absolutely do. And you know that, too. That's why your counter-arguments are so weak. lol

Francis isn't great ... You lost all credibility there . He ko you in one hit.

And no you don't know how genetics work.
 
Waiting on Pan to give us a "deep conversation on why this isn't racist"

Just call him out @panamaican

Anyways, I fail to see how this isn't racist. It's basically saying black people are theoretically less intelligent so we have to dumb down everyone else to make it "equal" for them. More racist liberal BS that you would never have thought was possible 10 years ago.
 
Maybe this jumble of bullshit made sense to you and was relevant to my post, but it made no sense to anyone else.

Can you name some great black philosophers?

Philosophy is what you by intelligence? I know alot of people who graduated in philosophy.. not impressed haaà haaaa.
 
Absolutely serious. Look at virtually every great black athlete - slave descent.



Wouldn't that also be true for blacks in the Americas? Boxing for example has always been a poor man's sport, and it doesn't get much poorer than sub-Saharan Africa. So why don't we see the same type of boxing talent from sub-Saharan Africa as the black talent we see of slave descent in the Americas?



Piss-weak argument. Ngnanou isn't great. He's average with massive power, and was utterly exposed by Miocic after KOing a string of fighters. You're just proving my point. We're talking about great like Roy Jones Jr, Ali, Mayweather etc etc. When has sub-Saharan Africa EVER produced such an athlete? Like I said - boxing has ALWAYS been a poor man's sport. That's why it was so popular amongst immigrant groups in the USA in the early-mid 20th century - Irish, Italian, Jewish, Polish etc etc.



It's not "my" slave theory. It's been observed by lots of people and it has nothing to do with evolution. What on earth do animals have to do with this? Crossing the Atlantic on those slave ships was hell and only the fittest survived. Then, the work the slaves had to do was brutal and so many died because of it. Again, only the fittest survived. Then on top of all that, blacks have a good chunk of European ancestry (and some Native American) and the more genetically diverse a person is, they tend to possess greater athleticism.



Oh, I do. I absolutely do. And you know that, too. That's why your counter-arguments are so weak. lol

@kenetics


I would say more than "slave genetics" boxing success comes down to it being popular in the black community. Good gyms, experience, etc.
 
So boxing doesn't count because excuses.


Remind us about education when whites dominated boxing, oh yeah, it was terrible.


I would argue the "more athletics" argument.

Perhaps popular sports, basketball (far more popular in the black community), and speed positions in football.

But sports in general? Wrestling? Soccer? Y'all know who rules the water polo scene.


<BC1>


You know they were mad when tiger woods came to golf lol.
 
Just call him out @panamaican

Anyways, I fail to see how this isn't racist. It's basically saying black people are theoretically less intelligent so we have to dumb down everyone else to make it "equal" for them. More racist liberal BS that you would never have thought was possible 10 years ago.
It's racist, but some people won't call it racist. It makes blacks and other minorites look the are dumb which they are not.
 
Just call him out @panamaican

Anyways, I fail to see how this isn't racist. It's basically saying black people are theoretically less intelligent so we have to dumb down everyone else to make it "equal" for them. More racist liberal BS that you would never have thought was possible 10 years ago.

**like


Like I've been saying since day one.

We all know who the true racists are
 
Back
Top