- Joined
- May 1, 2005
- Messages
- 46,217
- Reaction score
- 20,457
Did I say that? I’m just putting out her rational. I never said to trust herShe's a weirdo attention whoring cokehead, don't know how she has any credibility
Did I say that? I’m just putting out her rational. I never said to trust herShe's a weirdo attention whoring cokehead, don't know how she has any credibility
You asked if it was strange, I described her to show why it wasn't strange.... You and her share a straw?Did I say that? I’m just putting out her rational. I never said to trust her
Is that what she claimed? I thought the claim was he groped her.Now you believe the word of a women who’s comes forward years later. I wish you were this consistent when Dr. Ford claimed Kavanaugh raped her.
What makes you think that I don't believe it to be the case? I'm not disputing that at all.Are you claiming this isn't true? Newsom banged his close friend and campaign manager's wife on his way to wrecking San Francisco even more, and kept failing upward and has shown over and over again that the rules don't apply to him, and not even common courtesy applies to him. All Larry Elder is offering is that everyone else gets to live as freely as Newsom already does. The guy keeps his own winery open while closing everyone else's, his own kids go to school while he shuts down everyone else's, he shuts down restaurants then goes to a dinner party at one with his donor buddies and lobbyists, he told restaurants to spend a ton of money accommodating outdoor dining, shut them down anyway while his donors set up craft services in the same parking lot, but you think this is where he and his family would draw the line?
Not exactly surprising that someone who was chewed up and spat out has resentment towards the people who chewed her up and spat her out.
I say this with 95,000 posts but you really like the sound of your own voice.
I really don't give a fuck about left or right. She should have barked up about in 2017 and not kept it to herself till 2 days before the Recall.
Didn't say I believe her or not. Don't know either way, but Newsom is a scumbag, Harvey Weinstein is a rapist, democrats were covering for him when everybody knew it for decades, and Rose McGowen has been saying that for years.Now you believe the word of a women who’s comes forward years later. I wish you were this consistent when Dr. Ford claimed Kavanaugh raped her.
Mate. Out of your depth.94,381 you have posts
Should round to 94,000 or 94,400 or even 94,500
It doesnt mean she isnt wrong and that Newsom doesnt need to go
F#ck Newsom!
So what's the coincidence? Rose McGowen didn't just come out of nowhere with a random accusation from years earlier. She's been saying the same thing for years, and now brings up the Newsom part of it because he is in a recall election. Not like this doesn't fit with Newsom's circle of friends, previous practices, and the most powerful people in the democrat party's treatment of Harvey Weinstein for close to 30 years.What makes you think that I don't believe it to be the case? I'm not disputing that at all.
We always seem to agree, lol.Political strategists know when to strike. Some accusations or scandals have staying power while others burn hot but briefly. This story doesn't hit like a "grab em by the pussy" heavyweight so our gnat like attention span would have forgotten about it by now if it hit a month ago. Timing is everything?
The issue with her is that she's sanctimonious when it comes to this whole #metoo movement and exposing these people but she was silent with allegations against someone that was attempting to silence the movement and in turn allow a rapist to escape justice. If that person suppressed her truth, how many more women were silenced in the 4 years that Rose chose to be silent on this very issue that is so near and dear to her heart? Rose enabled the silencers with her silence.So what's the coincidence? Rose McGowen didn't just come out of nowhere with a random accusation from years earlier. She's been saying the same thing for years, and now brings up the Newsom part of it because he is in a recall election. Not like this doesn't fit with Newsom's circle of friends, previous practices, and the most powerful people in the democrat party's treatment of Harvey Weinstein for close to 30 years.
The fact it's 2 days before the Recall, as I stated. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but as you and a few have stated, timing is everything.So what's the coincidence? Rose McGowen didn't just come out of nowhere with a random accusation from years earlier. She's been saying the same thing for years, and now brings up the Newsom part of it because he is in a recall election. Not like this doesn't fit with Newsom's circle of friends, previous practices, and the most powerful people in the democrat party's treatment of Harvey Weinstein for close to 30 years.
Not on mandatory vaccination we don't! All good. Life would suck if we were all clones.We always seem to agree, lol.
Who?The issue with her is that she's sanctimonious when it comes to this whole #metoo movement and exposing these people but she was silent with allegations against someone that was attempting to silence the movement and in turn allow a rapist to escape justice. If that person suppressed her truth, how many more women were silenced in the 4 years that Rose chose to be silent on this very issue that is so near and dear to her heart? Rose enabled the silencers with her silence.
She wasn't silent. She's not claiming she was silenced, she's claiming Newsom's wife tried to bribe her to shut up, which obviously didn't work.The issue with her is that she's sanctimonious when it comes to this whole #metoo movement and exposing these people but she was silent with allegations against someone that was attempting to silence the movement and in turn allow a rapist to escape justice. If that person suppressed her truth, how many more women were silenced in the 4 years that Rose chose to be silent on this very issue that is so near and dear to her heart? Rose enabled the silencers with her silence.
I didn't say she was silenced, i said it was an attempt to silence the movement. I said she was silent against the person that attempted to silence her (Mrs. Newsom) not that she was silenced against Weinstein. Now she's talking about the Newsoms, where were they in her rants years ago?She wasn't silent. She's not claiming she was silenced, she's claiming Newsom's wife tried to bribe her to shut up, which obviously didn't work.
We'll dodge that one here.Not on mandatory vaccination we don't! All good. Life would suck if we were all clones.
She's a weirdo attention whoring cokehead, don't know how she has any credibility