Crime After years of denials, Hunter Biden FINALLY acknowledged Joe was ‘the big guy’ in $5M China deal

[ColemanwastheGOAT]

Can you make a logical case for that using quotes?

For years they denied the 'big guy' referred to in the emails was Biden. It was.

 

[koquerelle]

I know that most voters (regardless of who they are voting for) are not well-informed so fair enough, but I think if you were following closely, there was a huge gap. I think it was a moral test (again, for people who were aware). I didn't say that in 2012 (or 2008, but I wasn't posting in the WR then). I said then that I had strong disagreements with Romney on policy, and I didn't like the campaign, but he was highly experienced, clean in terms of corruption, and very intelligent and competent. Trump is a sleazy huckster, who was running a campaign of pure hate and flamboyant incompetence.

You are, once again, judging people's choices because you're too analytical. Shades of grey do not exist for you. You live in a binary world. Everyone who voted for Trump made a bad decision.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

For years they denied the 'big guy' referred to in the emails was Biden. It was.

Was he getting 10% all along?

 

[Jack V Savage]

You are, once again, judging people's choices because you're too analytical. Shades of grey do not exist for you. You live in a binary world. Everyone who voted for Trump made a bad decision.

You're overgeneralizing to a ridiculous degree. There are shades of gray on many issues. I don't think this is one (and note I explicitly stated that other elections were not as clear-cut).

 

[Jack V Savage]

For years they denied the 'big guy' referred to in the emails was Biden. It was.

My post contained a question. Can I take your ducking of it to mean that the answer is no?

Your claim was that there was an admission of lying, which is itself a lie. You just made it up.

The claim in the headline here is that Hunter acknowledged it, which is also a lie. He claimed no knowledge of it and stated very clearly that Joe was not involved in any of his deals, and he never stated otherwise.

 

[ColemanwastheGOAT]

My post contained a question. Can I take your ducking of it to mean that the answer is no?

Your claim was that there was an admission of lying, which is itself a lie. You just made it up.

The claim in the headline here is that Hunter acknowledged it, which is also a lie. He claimed no knowledge of it and stated very clearly that Joe was not involved in any of his deals, and he never stated otherwise.

I can't help that you're illiterate.

 

[Rod1]

Communism is when you establish a hereditary monarchy

Ironic isn't it?

 

[Voodoo_Child906]

I do recall seeing that, actually. I read it as him addressing the questioner’s premise. He also said he didn’t know who it was referring to in the same exchange, and again multiple other times, so it’s quite a stretch to pretend that this is an admission of anything.

I think at most he admitted that Gilliar was most likely referring to Joe as the big guy in that message. It looks like Hunter never responded to Gillar's comment in any subsequent messages. Gaetz asks him why it wasn't protested or even talked about in subsequent emails. Hunter replies that doesn't even remember seeing it, which is kind of strange since he did reply to the email.

Am I to understand your testimony correctly that you do not remember whether
or not you protested this concept of an agreement to give 10 percent to your father?
The Witness. Again, I can't answer that question other than to say, is that, if I
had read it and understood it to be my father, I would have protested. However --
Mr. Gaetz. How often do you reply to emails that you don't read?
The Witness. At that time, I think I replied to a lot of emails that I don't fully
read. And you have whatever -- you have all my emails. You have every email that I've
ever written and ones that I never wrote.
And so I can tell you that many times you miss something. You don't see it.
But, regardless of anything, I can tell you this: My father was never an equity holder in
any business that I was ever in. Whatever was proposed here never occurred.

So I have to say, this peculiarity is not enough to impeach obviously, but it is enough to raise suspicion to those that are already looking for something.

 

[Sinister]

You don’t understand that I know how to remove you for blatant trolling. Everything is screenshotted. Have fun

You're so tough. Creepy, but tough.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I can't help that you're illiterate.

I can read, but you can't help that you were caught lying again.

 

[ColemanwastheGOAT]

I can read, but you can't help that you were caught lying again.

I didn't lie about anything. You might be able to read but your reading comprehension is the issue.

 

[blackheart]

No... you will vote for "the Big Guy" taking Chinese $ while they kill over 100,000 Americans with Fentanyl every year, steal our IP, threaten Taiwan, enslave people, and push their brand throughout the world attacking the U.S.A. interests. You vote for the guy that sold out to the commies. You do you.

It is confirmed on record that Trump businesses took in millions and millions of Chinese dollars while he was in office....

Like, on the one hand, you have a conspiracy and make believe that Biden took Chinese money. And you're up in arms about the unconfirmed conspiracy. But when it comes to Trump being confirmed taking millions from the Chinese? Nothing from the cult. Not a word.

 

[Whippy McGee]

It is confirmed on record that Trump businesses took in millions and millions of Chinese dollars while he was in office....

Like, on the one hand, you have a conspiracy and make believe that Biden took Chinese money. And you're up in arms about the unconfirmed conspiracy. But when it comes to Trump being confirmed taking millions from the Chinese? Nothing from the cult. Not a word.

What service did Hunter Biden or any Biden, that received $5,000,000 perform?

Quit being a drone. It's pathetic.

 

[Loiosh]

That's where I have issues with you. You want to be viewed as a man with no bias and you act like everybody who voted for Trump in 2016 should wear a badge of infamy. It's a terrible opinion.

You should watch The Circus 2016 season. The election night episode opened my eyes.

Do you know anyone here in Quebec that supported Trump? I do. I know black people in Quebec that support Trump and think he's being oppressed by the system. I know a granola girl originally from South America by way of San Francisco who supports Trump.

These are good people and I've desperately tried to understand them, but they know how unpopular their opinions on Trump are so conversations are difficult.

 

[BAM]

is there any evidence that Joe Biden did anything in this space? Because I don't need some giant dossier to surmise that his dipshit, crackhead, nepobaby son name-dropped "Joe Biden" every chance he got since he was 6 years old. That doesn't mean that Joe actually was in on it. I do not doubt that Hunter would tell people that through him they would have a backchannel to his dad and that he probably grifted millions.

But what about Joe? Anything?

 

[Super_Nintendo]

These are good people and I've desperately tried to understand them, but they know how unpopular their opinions on Trump are so conversations are difficult.

maybe this will help. the establishment's reaction to trump woke people up to the crookedness of politics and all the lies they feed people 24/7, and standing against that bs is more important to people than any one person.

 

[Loiosh]

maybe this will help. the establishment's reaction to trump woke people up to the crookedness of politics and all the lies they feed people 24/7, and standing against that bs is more important to people than any one person.

That isn't it.

You don't fight corruption by electing the most corrupt politician in modern memory.

 

[Super_Nintendo]

That isn't it.

You don't fight corruption by electing the most corrupt politician in modern memory.

even if trump's corruption is as accurate as the left says it is, which let's be honest with all the fake news it's not, people still focus on the larger more corrupt system than one man. all they see is a much larger gang of corrupt scumbags going after another "corrupt" person. it's easy to see who people support, and it makes sense.

 

[Loiosh]

even if trump's corruption is as accurate as the left says it is, which let's be honest with all the fake news it's not, people still focus on the larger more corrupt system than one man. all they see is a much larger gang of corrupt scumbags going after another "corrupt" person. it's easy to see who people support, and it makes sense.

So prove it, and accept when you can't.

One day you'll appreciate how actual leftists could be your strongest allies in proving Democrat corruption, only you won't because they call out ALL corruption regardless of party lines.

 

[idrankyourbeer]