- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Messages
- 5,940
- Reaction score
- 11,679
Can you make a logical case for that using quotes?
For years they denied the 'big guy' referred to in the emails was Biden. It was.
Can you make a logical case for that using quotes?
You are, once again, judging people's choices because you're too analytical. Shades of grey do not exist for you. You live in a binary world. Everyone who voted for Trump made a bad decision.I know that most voters (regardless of who they are voting for) are not well-informed so fair enough, but I think if you were following closely, there was a huge gap. I think it was a moral test (again, for people who were aware). I didn't say that in 2012 (or 2008, but I wasn't posting in the WR then). I said then that I had strong disagreements with Romney on policy, and I didn't like the campaign, but he was highly experienced, clean in terms of corruption, and very intelligent and competent. Trump is a sleazy huckster, who was running a campaign of pure hate and flamboyant incompetence.
Was he getting 10% all along?For years they denied the 'big guy' referred to in the emails was Biden. It was.
You're overgeneralizing to a ridiculous degree. There are shades of gray on many issues. I don't think this is one (and note I explicitly stated that other elections were not as clear-cut).You are, once again, judging people's choices because you're too analytical. Shades of grey do not exist for you. You live in a binary world. Everyone who voted for Trump made a bad decision.
My post contained a question. Can I take your ducking of it to mean that the answer is no?For years they denied the 'big guy' referred to in the emails was Biden. It was.
My post contained a question. Can I take your ducking of it to mean that the answer is no?
Your claim was that there was an admission of lying, which is itself a lie. You just made it up.
The claim in the headline here is that Hunter acknowledged it, which is also a lie. He claimed no knowledge of it and stated very clearly that Joe was not involved in any of his deals, and he never stated otherwise.
Communism is when you establish a hereditary monarchy
I do recall seeing that, actually. I read it as him addressing the questioner’s premise. He also said he didn’t know who it was referring to in the same exchange, and again multiple other times, so it’s quite a stretch to pretend that this is an admission of anything.
You don’t understand that I know how to remove you for blatant trolling. Everything is screenshotted. Have fun
I can read, but you can't help that you were caught lying again.I can't help that you're illiterate.
I can read, but you can't help that you were caught lying again.
It is confirmed on record that Trump businesses took in millions and millions of Chinese dollars while he was in office....No... you will vote for "the Big Guy" taking Chinese $ while they kill over 100,000 Americans with Fentanyl every year, steal our IP, threaten Taiwan, enslave people, and push their brand throughout the world attacking the U.S.A. interests. You vote for the guy that sold out to the commies. You do you.
It is confirmed on record that Trump businesses took in millions and millions of Chinese dollars while he was in office....
Like, on the one hand, you have a conspiracy and make believe that Biden took Chinese money. And you're up in arms about the unconfirmed conspiracy. But when it comes to Trump being confirmed taking millions from the Chinese? Nothing from the cult. Not a word.
That's where I have issues with you. You want to be viewed as a man with no bias and you act like everybody who voted for Trump in 2016 should wear a badge of infamy. It's a terrible opinion.
You should watch The Circus 2016 season. The election night episode opened my eyes.
These are good people and I've desperately tried to understand them, but they know how unpopular their opinions on Trump are so conversations are difficult.
maybe this will help. the establishment's reaction to trump woke people up to the crookedness of politics and all the lies they feed people 24/7, and standing against that bs is more important to people than any one person.
That isn't it.
You don't fight corruption by electing the most corrupt politician in modern memory.
even if trump's corruption is as accurate as the left says it is, which let's be honest with all the fake news it's not, people still focus on the larger more corrupt system than one man. all they see is a much larger gang of corrupt scumbags going after another "corrupt" person. it's easy to see who people support, and it makes sense.