- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 11,402
- Reaction score
- 6,185
*You're
And you're welcome as well.
Your welcome
*You're
And you're welcome as well.
damn gettin real defensive <Lmaoo>there are two different studies that have been reviewed multiple times. the Neidig study is mildly flawed in that it includes violence from spouse to officer but the officer to spouse violence was still around 30%.
just googling “police officer kills wife” will return like 600 different cases over the last couple years. live in denial and pretend you’re innocent all you want, the fact that cops are cowardly losers is well-documented.
This is one of those cases that for me, is a real conundrum. Kyle was clearly down there to have a conflict and had a long gun ready for that potential fight. When it occurred, he killed two people... even if he was 'defending himself.' And he was, at least in the video I saw.
At the end of the day, I hate everything about this scenario. Kyle, his Mom (What the fuck was she thinking), the people that tried assaulting an idiot with an AR-15, the cops that allowed him to pass right after killing two people and that dumb smirk on his fat, ugly face.
This entire thing is disgusting.
A woman beater? Man you soyboys are delusional nutt bags. Comparing that brawl where no information is available to a pedo shows how literally insane you and your ilk are.A woman beater shot and killed a sex offender, yes. A real winning situation all around.
A man is on video violently attacking a female from behind and you think that hardly qualifies as womanbeater?A woman beater? Man you soyboys are delusional nutt bags. Comparing that brawl where no information is available to a pedo shows how literally insane you and your ilk are.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/n...e-Rittenhouse-repeatedly-punching-female.html
definitely qualifies as a “woman beater”. JHC you kiddos need help
Look at Ike Turner here...Sounds like some close to home stuff...feel bad for any woman in your life. Sheesh.A woman beater? Man you soyboys are delusional nutt bags. Comparing that brawl where no information is available to a pedo shows how literally insane you and your ilk are.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/n...e-Rittenhouse-repeatedly-punching-female.html
definitely qualifies as a “woman beater”. JHC you kiddos need help
A man is on video violently attacking a female from behind and you think that hardly qualifies as womanbeater?
Exactly.As opposed to non-violently attacking her?
Weird post in a discussion of dudes who beat up chicks.As opposed to non-violently attacking her?
I feel like most people are more in this end of the spectrum rather than people cheering Kyle. This is an incident with a lot of nuance and it's really hard to be entirely either/or, until we get to legal statutes and applying them.
It's easy to argue that a 17 years old probably shouldn't be at a riot with a gun to play cop. Not a lot of people disagree there. At the same time, said 17 year old is still free to use said weapon to defend himself if necessary, even if him being there with the gun isn't the best idea in the world.
At the end of the day, a murder one charge is an applicable legal statute and must be treated as such. It either meets the criteria or it does not, regardless of what you personally feel should or should not have happened or what you think someone may have either thought or intended. If you can't prove their thoughts or intentions legally, then it doesn't matter.
Weird post in a discussion of dudes who beat up chicks.
Weird post in a discussion of dudes who beat up chicks.
I think you're implying dishonesty on my part but not sure, if so, what was I dishonest about?Weird to talk about beating up chicks in a discussion regarding psychopathic pedophiles getting what they deserve.
See? I can be dishonest, too.
he was?how so? He was condemning kyle for attacking that girl, as we all should. But we should not fail to recognize Kyle’s right to defend himself from imminent harm regardless of him beating up a girl or saying he would like to fire some shots over the heads of looters. In my opinion, that was frustration that those assholes do whatever they want and get away with it. A lot of people feel that frustration
Who let their kids out to burn and loot though?And I also wouldn't set my kids out to burn and loot. Like I said, this is a stupid game to play.
This is one of those cases that for me, is a real conundrum. Kyle was clearly down there to have a conflict and had a long gun ready for that potential fight. When it occurred, he killed two people... even if he was 'defending himself.' And he was, at least in the video I saw.
At the end of the day, I hate everything about this scenario. Kyle, his Mom (What the fuck was she thinking), the people that tried assaulting an idiot with an AR-15, the cops that allowed him to pass right after killing two people and that dumb smirk on his fat, ugly face.
This entire thing is disgusting.
No, it's not OK for minors to provide armed support, they aren't trained the way actual policemen are. At the very least if these people were authorizing and backing up Kyle they should have had him stay on the property they were there to defend. Somebody fucked up so bad supervising Kyle that it's all crickets when asking what adult was responsible for him.I don't think it's clear at all that he desired conflict. What was clear is that he expected it was a high possibility which is why he armed himself like any sane person would in his position.
What it boils down to is the question: is it legal for a citizen, of his age, to act as a peacekeeper. In most cases I would say no, they should call the police, but in this situation the police made it clear they weren't going to help protect the property of those business owners.
So ask yourself, if the defund the police works, and nobody is coming when you call 911... is it okay for you to confront people who are trying to do harm to others, or do you just need to run away and let criminals be in charge? And if you choose to confront those people is it okay for you to arm yourself, and if not why do we allow the police to arm themselves as peacekeepers?
You are partisan too. Feel stress and frustration just like every other adult does. And LOL at shooting over over their heads. Is that what he actually said? The recording I heard was him stating he wished he had his AR. Apparently that's so incriminating you want to sanitize his comment.how so? He was condemning kyle for attacking that girl, as we all should. But we should not fail to recognize Kyle’s right to defend himself from imminent harm regardless of him beating up a girl or saying he would like to fire some shots over the heads of looters. In my opinion, that was frustration that those assholes do whatever they want and get away with it. A lot of people feel that frustration