- Joined
- Oct 18, 2010
- Messages
- 9,170
- Reaction score
- 5,902
Sorry. I don't have any brothers that rape women and children, or sell sex slaves , or murder , or fuck goats. Maybe this person just has a different lifestyle .
So Trudeau is using a polite generic term for this group in the hopes of getting people out of the country safely (And alive), he is a cuck?
It's called being diplomatic.
Imagine if he called the Taliban what they really are publicly. Good way to get your people out of a potential war zone.
People get triggered by the dumbest shit.
So Trudeau is using a polite generic term for this group in the hopes of getting people out of the country safely (And alive), he is a cuck?
It's called being diplomatic.
Imagine if he called the Taliban what they really are publicly. Good way to get your people out of a potential war zone.
People get triggered by the dumbest shit.
Yeah that's the same.....lolDo you not remember how amped up people got when Trump was insulting enemy states and leaders? They love that shit.
Bro, if we all pick up our hockey sticks and don our mighty toques we would be unstoppable!
You don't refer to pedophile rapists and murderers as "brothers". No way to justify it. You are an idiot. The taliban are guaranteed laughing at this and Canada.So Trudeau is using a polite generic term for this group in the hopes of getting people out of the country safely (And alive), he is a cuck?
It's called being diplomatic.
Imagine if he called the Taliban what they really are publicly. Good way to get your people out of a potential war zone.
People get triggered by the dumbest shit.
Wait... what's wrong with that description?
Yeah that's the same.....lol
Come on J. You are better than that
So Trudeau is using a polite generic term for this group in the hopes of getting people out of the country safely (And alive), he is a cuck?
It's called being diplomatic.
Imagine if he called the Taliban what they really are publicly. Good way to get your people out of a potential war zone.
People get triggered by the dumbest shit.
Wait... what's wrong with that description?
Besides the obvious, does anybody else have a problem with "Minister for Women and Gender Equality"? Focusing on only two aspects of identity is starting the equality conversation from an unequal starting point. Are women and gender benders the only ones worthy of equality? Because that's what they're implying by omission. Include all or none. That's equality.