In context, clearly I wasn't saying ever in my life, but in this discussion.
Good but irrelevant.
But being honest, there was no misrepresentation, and your attempt to shift the discussion was deceitful.
Factually she is, but I wasn't saying that in the discussion because it was about something else. Did you see my point about discussing what we're discussing instead of seeing every discussion as a chance to litigate worldviews? I didn't think it was hard to understand.
I think it's more that you're ashamed about your actions. I expect you'll get over it.
I'm going to take one last crack at understanding where you are coming from.
You make a statement that you have not accused Tulsi of being a Russian asset. This seems at odds with your general attitude towards her on the forum, so I take a cursory look at your posting history, and it shows that you have explicitly called her a Russian asset. I point this out. Rather than explain this apparent contradiction in your thinking, which is certainly germane to the issue at hand, you attack me and call me dishonest for pointing this out.
I'm going to set aside your general point about worldview, which I think has some merit in terms of how one ought to order one's opinions, but has limited relevance to this discussion. It should be obvious that I am
not litigating worldviews. I am trying to figure out what your real position is on Tulsi Gabbard, because you are offering up positions in different threads which are, on their face, contradictory. In no way, shape, or form, is that 'litigating worldviews'; your opinion on Gabbard is a discrete issue, and when you say different things in different places, that raises some questions.
Just so I'm clear, is it your position that it was dishonest or illegitimate of me to point out that what you are saying
in this thread is directly at odds with statements you have made in other threads when similar topics have arisen? And if so, why? You appear to be implying some unspoken rule siloing off each thread so that the discussion must begin
tabula rasa, but this is hardly a sensible way to continue ongoing discussions in a forum.
You seem to think I should have let this go, but I don't see how anyone can hope to have a discussion with you on any topic when you attack other posters for trying to nail down your position.