First of all, starting a conversation with a stranger with "you're a fucking retard" is not only discourteous, but reflects a lack of good interpersonal skills to communicate factual information in a constructive way.
Fact is, Pereira dominated Imadaev from pillar to post. Accordingly, he WAS a justified favourite. Investment and risk evaluation often means being able to think out of the box - my research led me to the conclusion that Pereira is a good bet and it worked out as expected. End of story.
Facts are facts: Imadaev was a bad bet PRE-FIGHT and Andre Muniz, Ovince St. Preux and Alistair Overeem were all good underdogs PRE-FIGHT. That's why I bet Pereira, Andre Muniz, Ovince St. Preux and Alistair Overeem; individually and in parlays. I didn't expect to hit EVERY underdog, but the core of the statement was: why bet 4500$ on a volatile option like Imadaev, when you have other good underdogs available?