Robert Whittaker: No controversy regarding #UFC297 headliner scoring

You're a real smartass sometimes sir lol

I had trouble scoring it too a little, but since I had a life and death AV bet on the line my brain was highly skewed. This lose doesn't count against my unblemished record, I'm like the Sean O'Malley of Sherdog.

Yup, scored it for DDP but easily can see it going to DeSean.

<GinJuice>

But we all know fighters and picking fights. They are no better than Sherdawgers... Often far far worse.

<6>

Of course Bobert was cheering for DDP, he kicked his ass.
I scored it 3-2 DDP.... If Strickland wouldn't have had a Hendricks moment mid fight... He could have won 4-1...

*** Don't cry about losing a fight when you showed ZERO killer instinct and went full Silva vs Maia
 
Not according to razor sharp MMA minds like @Killer Kadoogan, @ComfortablyNumb55 and @Dick
thank you, i would say i presented a good argument that i have yet hear anyone try to make some sort of answer that resembles anything other than:

- baby jabs
- because, because, just because OK?!!

i don't care if bobby knuckles, kim jong un, or Maui disagrees with me. nothing can refute 76 additional head strikes, 36 more significant strikes, more strikes landed/damage done in rounds 1, 3, 4, 5.
 
Whittaker vs Strickland sounds like the #1 contender fight to make :)

RRiJye.gif
 
thank you, i would say i presented a good argument that i have yet hear anyone try to make some sort of answer that resembles anything other than:

- baby jabs
- because, because, just because OK?!!

i don't care if bobby knuckles, kim jong un, or Maui disagrees with me. nothing can refute 76 additional head strikes, 36 more significant strikes, more strikes landed/damage done in rounds 1, 3, 4, 5.
1611xf.jpg
 
I really need to make the time to watch this again, but several of the rounds were very close so it’s not like I had the urge to start taking hostages because it was some unfathomable robbery.
At the time I thought it was 2-2 going into the 5th and Strickland took it , but I was drinking ;)
 
thank you, i would say i presented a good argument that i have yet hear anyone try to make some sort of answer that resembles anything other than:

- baby jabs
- because, because, just because OK?!!

i don't care if bobby knuckles, kim jong un, or Maui disagrees with me. nothing can refute 76 additional head strikes, 36 more significant strikes, more strikes landed/damage done in rounds 1, 3, 4, 5.
Sean's still the Champion imo. Next time he fights I'm just gonna pretend the belts on the line again. Lol


My personal AV bet aside, I think Sean won as well btw.
 
Sean's still the Champion imo. Next time he fights I'm just gonna pretend the belts on the line again. Lol


My personal AV bet aside, I think Sean won as well btw.
it was a very close fight. for sure. 100%. B. however, based off of the damage on DDPs face, the 76 additional strikes landed, 36 more sig strikes landed, and the fact that DDP's takedowns were all negated and never amounted to any sort of ground control, positioning, damage, i think that was an obvious win for sean strickland. none of their arguments hold and can be easily refuted/broken down. Sean won, and the people who want to say he lost, i mean look at them. look at their responses. these are the same types that think a lot of stupid ass shit and all probably trust the xyience.
 
it was a very close fight. for sure. 100%. B. however, based off of the damage on DDPs face, the 76 additional strikes landed, 36 more sig strikes landed, and the fact that DDP's takedowns were all negated and never amounted to any sort of ground control, positioning, damage, i think that was an obvious win for sean strickland. none of their arguments hold and can be easily refuted/broken down. Sean won, and the people who want to say he lost, i mean look at them. look at their responses. these are the same types that think a lot of stupid ass shit and all probably trust the xyience.
All fair points and the way I saw it as well. What's done is done and off to the next I guess.
 
thank you, i would say i presented a good argument that i have yet hear anyone try to make some sort of answer that resembles anything other than:

- baby jabs
- because, because, just because OK?!!

i don't care if bobby knuckles, kim jong un, or Maui disagrees with me. nothing can refute 76 additional head strikes, 36 more significant strikes, more strikes landed/damage done in rounds 1, 3, 4, 5.
lmao worked
 
Its no robbery. We just have to come to terms with the fact that every decision is a robbery these days, its beyond ridiculous at this point. The robbery threads need to be clamped down on, we are getting tons and tons of robbery threads after every razor close decision.

I'm sure a lot of people on here agree with me that the constant robbery threads after every very close fight is just too much now.

I remember in the past we would get like a few robbery threads a year, there was barely any. But after Covid Lockdown it has got so much, a lot of new users from Covid Lockdown watching the sport for the first time as nothing else on and they don't know what they're watching, the robbery threads have been done to death now, its after every single close decision
 
Back
Top