- Joined
- Sep 9, 2020
- Messages
- 4,489
- Reaction score
- 1,849
I absolutely guarantee Miocic would be getting PPV points.
exactly i would guess he would get at least 5 times more money to fight jones then he would the other 2
I absolutely guarantee Miocic would be getting PPV points.
do we have any training vids of jiri? His IG has no training vids. If his shoulder is as serious as reported I would want to see how he looks and moves around first. If alex didnt just get chinned by Izzy recently I would have a lot more confidence in him. I currently have a small ML play on alex and I will be looking to live bet either fighter if the fight lasts long enough.I like Dern (-177, BOL) a lot. Andrade is on her way out, and Dern has title ambitions.
Sadykhov (-155), BSD (-200), and Loopy (-132) also on my radar.
Jiri likes to fight with his hands down, but when he slowed down against Glover in the later rounds it was getting him punched quite a lot by slow, old, but technically sound Glover. Considering Pereira. OTOH, I could see Pereira get rag-dolled by Jiri, who is huge and very strong.
I like him, Castañeda and Van. Other than that, I agree with you.i honestly hate this card. too many 50/50 fights , except Emmers
looks like a prop bet type card.
yep I took madsen at +175 opening. Gordon is benefiting heavily from the paddy "robbery" hype talk. No shame in omadsen losing to dawson via backpack and sub. He did it to ismagulov for 15 minutes as well, only way to beat dawson is starching him like green or hoping he gasses.I like him, Castañeda and Van. Other than that, I agree with you.
There's a few lines I don't understand, like Gordon at -175 over Madsen. Think that should be closer since I could see a world where Mark gets off to a good start and grinds out the first two rounds.
That's a pretty good line. A similar one is Viacheslav opener's, think he was even wider.yep I took madsen at +175 opening. Gordon is benefiting heavily from the paddy "robbery" hype talk. No shame in omadsen losing to dawson via backpack and sub. He did it to ismagulov for 15 minutes as well, only way to beat dawson is starching him like green or hoping he gasses.
Casteneda really?I like him, Castañeda and Van. Other than that, I agree with you.
There's a few lines I don't understand, like Gordon at -175 over Madsen. Think that should be closer since I could see a world where Mark gets off to a good start and grinds out the first two rounds.
When has Casteneda lost a 3rd round in the UFC? He breaks people all the timeCasteneda really?
Im hesitant because of his cardio. Tends to lose the third round. Kang is always that guy that mounts a comeback. And he has a solid chin. There is a high possibility for a decision, it’s not like Kang can’t strike.
why does it have to be the ufc?When has Casteneda lost a 3rd round in the UFC? He breaks people all the time
The only times I've seen John lose the third in the was when he got outclassed by Wood. He finished Johns in the third and also got that round against Gafurov. I guess you could point at the Santos fight as well, but he blew his load pursuing a finish, don't think he'll be keen on doing that again.Casteneda really?
Im hesitant because of his cardio. Tends to lose the third round. Kang is always that guy that mounts a comeback. And he has a solid chin. There is a high possibility for a decision, it’s not like Kang can’t strike.
There are plenty of regional fights that show him fade in the third. Kang got grounded sure by a good credential grappler. Casteneda has yet to secure good ground ctrl in the ufc.The only times I've seen John lose the third in the was when he got outclassed by Wood. He finished Johns in the third and also got that round against Gafurov. I guess you could point at the Santos fight as well, but he blew his load pursuing a finish, don't think he'll be keen on doing that again.
I don't think Kang staging a late comeback is a foregone conclusion. Hell, I saw Kang drop that round against a notoriously gassy one dimensional BJJ guy in Yahya. John is someone that will force the issue, and I think that will mess with Kang.
I mean, the majority of Kang's wins are also finishes. His most recent two were both first round subs and past that, he's not usually someone who usually puts a stamp on his fights which is why he went to a split with some mediocre guys like the chinese dude he fought and Brandon Davis.why does it have to be the ufc?
Alday fight , near all of his losses are decision losses. He was winning against Santos until he wasn’t and slowed down badly.
The majority of his wins are finishes. He comes off strong in the first two rounds and then you see a drop in activity.
This looks like a live bet fight.
I’m not that interested in it to be honest.
I think it's debatable rather Miles is better than Kang's resume. Kang fought more solid competition in the span of the last 4 years.I mean, the majority of Kang's wins are also finishes. His most recent two were both first round subs and past that, he's not usually someone who usually puts a stamp on his fights which is why he went to a split with some mediocre guys like the chinese dude he fought and Brandon Davis.
I also think the Santos fight was an outlier for John since he went really hard for a finish, maybe he'll do that again, maybe not. For me, it's just a style thing, I think John's pressure will be more than enough to overwhelm Kang and let him take control of the fight early.
I also give more importance to Castañeda's UFC fights because it's his most recent footage, can't put much stock on fights from 5 years ago and such, his win over Johns alone stands out for me as the best win either guy have notched in the past few years.
I don't particularly rate Danaa or Quiñonez, had Kang against both, maybe that's why I feel more confident on John here - could be a case of me getting ahead of myself and thinking I've got Kang aptly rated.